We depend on precedents, on a vocabulary of patterns to organize and recognize our world. We use them in art, music, cooking, everything. As in everything else, in art we are often unconscious of our reliance on this vocabulary and how it limits us. The more aware we are of the limits of this learned vocabulary the more we improve our chances of expanding that vocabulary. Gustav Klimt and Claude Monet both illustrate this. Monet painted his ” Early Morning on the Seine ” series of paintings in the early and mid 1890s. He had been borrowing the forms of Corot just as Corot had borrowed from others. Monet too, had looked at the same sources as Corot but, Monet could build on the brushwork, pattern and color vocabulary of Corot. We can trace this vocabulary of forms back to Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt but, for now I will concentrate on Monet in the mid 1890s waking early in the morning to climb into his boat/studio to capture the subtle, soft lights of dawn on the Seine. He relies on the meandering “S” or zig zag form which he applies across the vertical field of the painting, from water surface into the sky (example 1). In 1899 Gustav Klimt, aware of the Monet’s innovations with luminosity, the “S” pattern, and Monet’s fusing reflected territories with the sources of the reflection. He had seen how the impressionists were able to evoke luminosity and a generous feeling of deep space through dissolved edges and cross patterns of broken brushwork zig-zagging across an illusory flat surface. Klimt tries to evoke the sense of soft luminosity, a reflective and tactile illusory surface and, atmospheric depth by using the Impressionist’s model (example 2). Like Monet, Klimt experiments with the mirror effects of sky and flora as they dissolve on a slightly vibrating watery surface. It’s a step toward abstraction but, still anchored in realism. In example three, Klimt painted more dissolved, more abstracted and more space-and-motion generating surfaces in this painting of the Schonbruun Park. The Blurred impressionist broken brushwork easily evokes a subtle sense of motion and an illusion of thick texture.
Here a few examples of my work as I take a more articulated painting and dissolve its edges with atmospheric engendering glazes. The glazes are semi-opaque. After liberally applying them to the work I next selectively delete areas of the glaze gently revealing aspect s of the original painting. My goal is to build more luminance and more space. Like Monet and Klimt I appropriated the “S” meander pattern. I give that form more light at the top of the image and more darkness at the bottom but, the transition is gradual and, helps amplify the feeling of space. The glazes are more opaque with oil diluted titanium white and a transparent color at the top of the painting. At the bottom of the painting the glazes are completely translucent; no opaque white is used.
example 4. before atmospheric glazes.
example 5. after glazing and glaze deletions.
example 6. before atmospheric glazes.
example 7. after glazing and glaze deletions.
My decision to apply the atmospheric glazes followed an analysis of the two paintings which I thought were too specific along their edges, too dark and, not unified enough in their light and the direction of light. I wanted more space, more luminosity, a deeper and softer air.
The next three examples demonstrate how to build a painting with radiance and a unity of light without the later application of glazes. This painting was constructed alla prima, all at once. I began with a 24×24 sheet of brushed gold anodized aluminum, a 4″ synthetic soft flat brush , and a couple of squeegees. In step one (example 8) I brushed on tinted color in the upper left ( white, vermillion, and gamboge) and I brushed on a deep red with ultramarine blue in the bottom. in example 9, prior to my continued blending I separated ( fanned) the bristles on my 4″ brush to simulate the effect a many stalks of sea grass. I blended the ultramarine blue with white and touches of the red to build lighter violets. I blended adjacent areas of color aiming for edgeless transitions. In example 3, I have removed the paint by applying various and many vertical touches of my squeegees to expose the brushed gold surface underneath. Finally, I retouched some of those squeegee deleted marks with paint from a flat 1″ soft synthetic.
example 8. First application of paint.
example 2. blending paint areas.
example 10. after squeegee and specific brush touches.



You have no idea how much I appreciate and value your blogs. I have encouraged others to sign on for them. They are clear, informative, concise and very well illustrated so that the novice, like myself, can understand.
Hi David,
Example 8 is the finished painting, no need to go on. If it was increased to room size it would rival Monet.
Later,
Don
Hi David, beautiful as always. I am still writing, haven’t painted a stroke since I left before the holidays. In fact, I am judging a writing contest at the moment. Isn’t that a hoot. Not easy, but I love the exercise.
You had the finished product in class last Tuesday. Great to see how you put it together. ( examples 8, 9 & 10 ).
Examples 4-7 . What happens in #5 is clear but # 6 needs further explanation as it is not clear how you proceed to # 7 which is really great. I like the Klimt #3 using the same values of greens for the reflection is very subtle and makes the painting work two ways. It is good!
I would like to learn more about broken brush strokes as my work is usually rubbed on paint … soft and well blended. And I loved to see how you do those beautiful floating leaves in the foreground.
You are an inquisitive scientist and very fine artist which makes this all so much more interesting when relating it to us. You paint what you teach!
Wonderful explication, examples. Thank you for the insights into the creative process.
Thank you for these blogs. They are interesting and inspiring. Could you share your source for aluminum panels? I work mostly in pastel, but your work has me itching to try painting on metal.
Thank you for the inspiration. Your blog is lovely.
A great lesson….focus on building vocabulary and use it to create. Opens up lots of possibilities! Thanks yet again.